Amazing features coming to Google In Future
One would think that web search is a solved problem, however this is not the case according to Google. Google's Udu Manber talks about some of the challenges here. One of the amazing features described in the link is the capability of writing a query in a foreign language, Google translates that query into English, searches the web (Most pages on the internet are in English), and returns matching results in the same language as the query, hence it automatically translates the pages. This is an amazing feature in my opinion.
Open Source World lacks Good Web Development IDEs
Linux is considered the de-facto server based operating system. A typical Linux distribution comes with everything any web developer could have asked for: php, apache, python, perl, ruby etc. However there is one thing that Linux sorely lacks: Web Development IDEs. Sure KDE comes with Quanta, and there is BlueFish, and there used to be Nvu. Each IDE has its own strengths, for example I love coding php in Quanta, BlueFish rocks at HTML authoring, however there is so much more to web development nowadays: XML, CSS3, JavaScript to name a few. And each IDE really sucks in handling these things. Today I was coding in Javascript and Quanta kept crashing!
To just give a flavor what the open source world is up against when it comes to web development IDEs. Just have a look at the latest enhancements to the already powerful Visual Studio (not a web development IDE par se, however VS always has supported web development due to ASP). Then of course, no comparison is complete without the mention of Adobe Dreamweaver, MS Expression Designer although seen as lame in the Windows world is light years ahead of any open source web development IDE unfortunately.
So what is a Linux web developer to do? Put up with crashing, feature deficient web development applications, or get the proprietary ones and run in them in through virtualization (this is the path I'm thinking of adapting)?
Stable Full NTFS support in Linux Atlast!
Adding full read/write NTFS support to Linux has been a story of damaged reputations, data corruptions and human ingenuity!
Since 1995 various groups have been working on adding support for NTFS to Linux, however their efforts were dealt a severe blow when Microsoft significantly changed the filesystem in Windows 2000. The project which came most near to a providing a complete support for NTFS was Captive NTFS which used Windows's own native ntfs driver wrapped in ReactOS, however due to proprietary issues Captive NTFS could not be accepted as a mainstream solution.
Now after 12 years in development, there is a full driver at last! NTFS-3G, which uses Filesystem in User Space (FUSE), and provides full read/write support for NTFS partitions. Such was the demand that within 5 days of release the projects main page, received 2 million hits! Here is a brief tutorial how to make use of it.
Installing NTFS-3G
The entire software can be downloaded from http://www.ntfs-3g.org/index.html, many distribution specific packages exist.OpenSUSE users can refer to this.
Creating a Parition
For full guide, check the official how-to by TLDP
Formatting the partition to ntfs
use the mkfs.ntfs utility to format a partition to NTFS, you could also use any Windows installation for this purpose (I would recommend the latter, as mkfs.ntfs is very slow)
usage:
mkfs.ntfs drive-name [eg. mkfs.ntfs /dev/sdb1]
Mounting NTFS drive
mount -t ntfs-3g drive-name mount-point [eg. mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/sdb1 /mnt/sdb1]
Unmounting the NTFS drive
umount drive-name
Intially when I installed ntfs-3g, I faced lots of stability problems. It complained something about using a kernel less than 2.6.20, I was using opensuse's default kernel 2.6.18-34, and I faced data corruption twice. Now I'm using the 2.6.22-2 kernel, and it seems to be working stable now. Additionally it was reported in the media that writing is slow in this driver, however I have not noticed any difference, maybe because I was writing to an external hard disk and the bottleneck was in the USB interface. Real performance can be measured in internal hard disk partitions.
KDE’s default sound system is in the stone ages!
In in Software terms it is! And let me explain why.
KDE's default sound subsystems, aRts (Analog realtime synthesizer) has been part of KDE since ages. I really appreciate the quality of lots of software it comes with, however aRts is a real disappointment. Since Windows 98 I believe MS Windows's sound system had the capability of running multiple sound streams at the same time, this is 2007, and one of the most popular window managers for Linux lacks this capability.
I was yesterday running an online video conferencing application, based on Java, and due to some bandwidth issue it wasn't going so well. So I logged into Skype, and guess what? Skype couldn't open the sound device, because it was already engaged by the Java application, hence I could run only one sound application at once. I've been aware of this problem since ages, from a previous Slackware 9.0 experience, however when I encountered the problem again yesterday I was both surprised and shocked how this problem could have gone unaddressed since ages. It turns out that since Dec 2004 development on aRts has been abandoned.
And if your wondering? No! There are many sound subsystems for Linux, which do not have this problem, you can run Amarok on Xine, and play some DVD movies on Xine at the same time, and you'll face no problem or you can run two instances of mplayer without any issue, however mplayer is an application. And there is no way
Fortunately, in the next major KDE release aRts will be replaced by an engine which makes it easier use more capable backends like Xine. In the meantime while KDE 4.0 is not out, we have to bear with aRts!
Hilarious Microsoft Surface Parody
Microsoft Surface is one cool technology, with lots and lots of potential uses. The following parody shows some in an hilarious way
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZrr7AZ9nCY]
AJAX Killer Resource
There is this killer resource for web 2.0 developers at http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/06/20/ajax-javascript-solutions-for-professional-coding/
It contains tutorials for nearly everything: from text auto-completion, menus, tabs, misc. interactivity etc..
Enjoy!
Safari Beta: Slowest Browser on the Windows Platform
Steve Jobs claimed that Safari was the "fastest browser" in the World. Bloggers say that he was referring to the page rendering speed, which is said to be faster than that of its rivals.
According to benchmarks carried out by Wired, Safari is the slowest of all browsers on Windows.
Get the benchmark results from Wired.
No iPhone SDK fiasco
There seems to be a loud and clear backlash by developers against Apple's decision not to provide a SDK for third party software development for the iPhone. They rather insist on on limiting third party apps to just AJAX applications, and that too without providing support for Flash!
I think that Apple, if they want to see the device really take off like its other hardware, they will eventually have to open the platform up, otherwise AJAX applications, as they stand are no match for native applications and as Gizmodo said it:
"So no SDK == no access to iPhone's cool frameworks == no revolutionary apps, no real new concepts coming from third-parties, no eye candy available for anyone but Apple and no possibility for some really crazy games that will fully exploit the graphic and multi-touch power of the iPhone."
A major problem I have seen with Linux smartphones is that they too do not come with a SDK, hence third party development for them is nearly null. Windows Mobile smart phones have a large third party software ecosystem and hence they have more penetration. Microsoft has always been a developer-friendly company.
I was once involved in a software project which involved a client side solution which was to be run on a mobile device, I explored numerous options, however Microsoft .NET Compact Framework was the only suitable and easy solution to develop for mobile devices, hence the company decided to develop their solution using Windows Mobile smart phones. Not having an SDK for the iPhone means that its penetration in enterprise circles would be minimum.
And for those people who believe that iPhone comes with MaxOS X and that even without an SDK they can run OSX applications on it, they would be disappointed! Check this peace by Josh Bancroft out.
Feed
Archives
- August 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
Categories
- adobe
- apple
- backup
- cluster computing
- clusters
- commercial apps
- Distributed Computing
- economics
- firefox
- FOSS
- grid computing
- industry news
- internet
- iPhone app
- ipod
- kde
- kernel development
- linux
- mac
- macosx
- microsoft
- misc
- mozilla
- n95
- networking
- networks
- open source
- opensuse
- operating systems
- pakistan
- perl
- personal
- podcast
- programming
- python
- safari
- security
- software
- startups
- supercomputing
- ubuntu
- Uncategorized
- virtualization
- web
- Web2
- web2.0
- webservices
- wimax
- windows
- wine